Both are returning 404 Not Found but there is data available so neither are being picked for some reason that may well need to be explored at your end.
Our search arose due to a dubious RO address - both are shown as being c/o Arthur Anderson, Birmingham although that practice no longer exists.
The URI dataset shows both as being Active but that is not the true position either - I suspect that both are Order of Court restorations, probably for litigation purposes that may, or may not, still be in progress.
- Why they are not being picked up
- What their status is.
There was a discussion some time back about a qualification flag to put the "Active" status in the proper context.